Juror 12 biography of williams

radio b newspaper people film directed by William Friedkin

For other productions, see Twelve Make you see red Men.

12 Angry Men is top-hole American made-for-televisiondrama film directed timorous William Friedkin, adapted by Reginald Rose from his original continuity of the same title.

Be evidence for is a remake of blue blood the gentry film of the same fame. The film aired on Sage 17, on Showtime.

Plot

In position murder trial of a puberty boy from a city difficulty, accused of murdering his sire, the judge instructs the demolish to determine his guilt plead innocence. The verdict must achieve unanimous and a guilty choosing will possibly (not mandatorily, contrasted in the film) result guarantee the death penalty.

The hulk of twelve retires to loftiness jury room.

An initial plebiscite is taken and eleven jurors vote for conviction. Juror 8, the lone dissenter, states ramble the evidence is circumstantial tell the boy deserves a deranged deliberation. He questions the verification of the two witnesses, title the fact that the carving knife used in the murder research paper not as unusual as rendering testimony indicates, producing an similar knife from his pocket.

Juror 8 proposes alternative vote by secret ballot – if the other jurors elect guilty unanimously, he will allow, but if at least way of being votes "not guilty" they determination continue deliberating. Only Juror 9 changes his vote, respecting Jurywoman 8's motives and feeling wreath points deserve further discussion.

After deliberating whether one witness in truth heard the murder take in, Juror 5, who grew have time out in a slum, changes her majesty vote. Juror 11, questioning bon gr the defendant would have composed the scene and returned tierce hours later to retrieve government knife, also changes his referendum. Jurors 2 and 6 as well vote "not guilty", tying integrity verdict at , after Panelist 8 demonstrates the unlikelihood defer one witness actually saw goodness boy flee the scene.

Excellence remaining jurors are intrigued in the way that Juror 11 proves that even though a psychiatric test stated go the boy had subconscious desires to kill, such tests single offer possible actions. Juror 7, impatient to attend a sport game that night, changes potentate vote, but Juror 11 chastises him for changing his ballot so casually and selfishly during the time that the boy's life is font the line.

When pressed do without Juror 11, Juror 7 at the end of the day states that he doubts nobleness boy is guilty.

Jurors 12 and 1 change their votes, leaving the only dissenters: Jurors 3, 4, and Outraged attractive the proceedings, Juror 10 goes on a bigoted diatribe bite the bullet Hispanic immigrants "outbreeding" African-Americans. Explicit attempts to leverage this take up again the other African-American jurors, criminal the rest of the shatter, until Juror 4 orders him to be quiet for representation rest of the proceedings.

Juror 4 states that despite yell the other evidence called hurt question, the testimony of character woman who saw the manslaughter from across the street stands as solid evidence. Juror 12 changes his vote back exchange "guilty", making the vote 8–4 again. Juror 9, seeing Panellist 4 rub his nose, sore by his glasses, realizes defer the witness had impressions crowd her nose, indicating that she wore glasses and likely was not wearing them when she saw the murder.

Jurors 12 and 4 change their elect to "not guilty". Juror 10, who says he still thinks the defendant is guilty, crudely admits to no longer lovesome about the verdict and votes for acquittal.

Undeterred, Juror 3 is forced to present sovereignty arguments again, and goes keep on a tirade, presenting the demonstrate in haphazard fashion and limiting with his disbelief that splendid son would kill his diminish father, mirroring his previous comments about his bad relationship tally his own son.

He begins to weep, and says yes can feel the knife establish plunged into his chest. Panelist 8 gently points out digress the boy is not king son, and Juror 4 giveaway persuades him to let loftiness boy live. Juror 3 gives in, and the final referendum is unanimous for acquittal.

The jurors leave and the respondent is found not guilty off-screen, while Juror 8 helps high-mindedness distraught Juror 3 with crown coat.

Before departing the deadly, Jurors 8 (Davis) and 9 (McCardle) exchange names before separating ways.

Cast

The Jury

Others

Reception

The film holds a 93% 'Fresh' score on review aggregator Decomposing Tomatoes, based on 15 commentator reviews with an average prohibitive of /^[2]

Awards and nominations

At say publicly Golden Globe Awards, actor Hurriedness Rhames won the award convey Best Actor – Miniseries financial support Television Film for his execution in Don King: Only conduct yourself America.

When presented with excellence award, he summoned Jack Histrion on to the stage service gifted the award to him, feeling that Lemmon was advanced deserving of it. Rhames refused to re-accept the award conj at the time that Lemmon tried to return reward to him, meaning that, despite the fact that Lemmon didn't officially win high-mindedness Golden Globe Award, he exact receive the trophy.

See also

Notes

• Friedkin, William, The Friedkin Connection, HarperCollins

References

External links